Should We Fear Deflation?
ثبت نشده
چکیده
DEFLATION IS BACK. In the six months from October 1998 to March 1999, some 438 articles about deflation appeared in major U.S. newspapers, compared with only 36 in the first half of 1997 and 10 in the first half of 1990. For sixty years, ever since the middle years of the Great Depression, deflation was a nonissue. Next to no one worried about it. Next to no one viewed a general decline in the price level as even a remote possibility. Now people do. And now people worry about it. One reason to worry about deflation is that today the rate of inflation in the United States is quite low, less than 2 percent per year. But that is not the whole story. The post–Korean War 1950s and the early 1960s saw measured rates of inflation as low as those of today (figure 1). Yet back then people worried not about deflation, but about inflation. Why is it that, in the late 1990s, inflation of 2 percent per year or less calls forth the fear of deflation, where it did not in the 1950s and 1960s? The principal reason why the low inflation of the 1950s and 1960s did not create fears of deflation was that economists in those days believed that economic institutions had a bias toward inflation, a legacy of the Keynesian revolution. Today that belief in an inflationary bias is gone, or at least greatly attenuated. What has happened to that belief, and to that built-in
منابع مشابه
Classical Deflation Theory
D eflation, the opposite of inflation, is a situation of falling general prices. It should not be confused with disinflation, which refers to a declining inflation rate that nevertheless remains positive. It was the successful U.S. disinflation of the 1990s, a disinflation that lowered the inflation rate sufficiently to create concern that further downward pressure might push it into negative t...
متن کاملDeflation and Depression: Is There an Empirical Link?
According to standard economic theory, deflation is the necessary consequence of optimal monetary policy. In 1969, Milton Friedman argued that, under the optimal policy, the nominal interest rate should be zero, and the price level should fall steadily at the real rate of interest. Since then, Friedman’s argument has been confirmed in a formal setting (see e.g., V. V. Chari et al., 1996; Harold...
متن کاملPreventing the Development of Observationally Learnt Fears in Children by Devaluing the Model’s Negative Response
Vicarious learning has become an established indirect pathway to fear acquisition. It is generally accepted that associative learning processes underlie vicarious learning; however, whether this association is a form of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus (CS-US) learning or stimulus-response (CS-CR) learning remains unclear. Traditionally, these types of learning can be dissociated in ...
متن کاملThe Trans-Pacific Partnership: Should We “Fear the Fear”?; Comment on “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?”
RLabonté et al entitle their paper in this issue of the International Journal of Health Policy and Management “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?” Tantalisingly, they do not directly answer the question they pose, and in this commentary, we suggest that it is the wrong question; we should not ‘fear’ the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at all, rather we should ...
متن کاملDeflation Caused by Bank Insolvency
The Japanese economy has suffered from persistent deflation since the mid-1990s, when the banking system fell into serious undercapitalization. In Germany and in China, worries about impending deflation have emerged, along with fear of prospective or hidden bank insolvency. In this paper I present a simple model in which bank insolvency causes deflation. During a period of bank insolvency, bank...
متن کامل